Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Rado True Square Automatic
Bulova's diver meets Rado's timepiece
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) offers Miyota Automatic precision in the tier below the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 measures 41mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The True Square Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Rado True Square Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $1,500–$2,500 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 38mm (Square) |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Automatic ETA C07.611 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Rado's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Rado True Square Automatic offers Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic construction at 38mm (Square) with Sapphire (Anti-Reflective). Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Automatic ETA C07.611
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The True Square Automatic uses the Automatic ETA C07.611 (Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based), 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The True Square Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 38mm (Square) — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the True Square Automatic at 38mm (Square). Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Rado True Square Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) and 80 Hours on the True Square Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the True Square Automatic handles 50m (5 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonRado
True Square Automatic
Choose the Rado True Square Automatic if you value Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm (Square) proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ETA C07.611 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Rado True Square Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Rado delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Rado True Square Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Rado's timepiece
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tissot's timepiece meets Bulova's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.