Casio Vintage A168WA vs Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase Manufacture
Casio's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (~$45) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision at $4,255 less than the Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase Manufacture (~$4,300). The Slimline Moonphase Manufacture counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective price points.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase Manufacture |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$45 | ~$4,300 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 42mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 1572 | Automatic FC-705 (In-House) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | In-House Automatic Manufacture |
| Power Reserve | — | 42 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Convex Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Frederique Constant's approach
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 1572 vs Automatic FC-705 (In-House)
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 42mm — different wrist presence
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio is $4,255 more affordable
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At ~$45, it delivers Quartz Module 1572 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonFrederique Constant
Slimline Moonphase Manufacture
Choose the Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase Manufacture if you value In-House Automatic Manufacture technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 42mm proportions. At ~$4,300, the Automatic FC-705 (In-House) with 42 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase Manufacture represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Frederique Constant delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase vs Longines Master Moonphase
Two moonphase dress watches from $2,450-$4,300
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — ~$3,600 vs ~$45
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase Manufacture
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch