Casio Vintage A168WA vs Longines Master Collection Moonphase
Casio's chronograph meets Longines's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Longines Master Collection Moonphase ($2,500–$5,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Master Collection Moonphase counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Longines Master Collection Moonphase |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $2,500–$5,000 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Automatic Caliber L899 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Automatic (ETA A31.L91 base) |
| Power Reserve | — | 72 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Longines's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Longines Master Collection Moonphase offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic Caliber L899
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Master Collection Moonphase uses the Automatic Caliber L899 (Automatic (ETA A31.L91 base), 72 Hours reserve) at 25,200 vph (3.5 Hz). The Master Collection Moonphase offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Master Collection Moonphase at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Longines Master Collection Moonphase at $2,500–$5,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 72 Hours on the Master Collection Moonphase. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Master Collection Moonphase handles 30m (3 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonLongines
Master Collection Moonphase
Choose the Longines Master Collection Moonphase if you value Automatic (ETA A31.L91 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $2,500–$5,000, the Automatic Caliber L899 with 72 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Longines Master Collection Moonphase represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Longines delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Frederique Constant Slimline Moonphase vs Longines Master Moonphase
Two moonphase dress watches under $5,000
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Longines Master Collection Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Longines's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.