Tudor Black Bay 58 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tudor's diver meets Casio's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Tudor Black Bay 58 ($2,500–$5,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Black Bay 58 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Manufacture Calibre MT5402. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Tudor Black Bay 58 | Casio Vintage A168WA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,500–$5,000 | Under $50 |
| Case Size | 39mm | 36.3mm |
| Movement | Automatic Manufacture Calibre MT5402 | Quartz Module 3298 |
| Caliber Type | In-House Automatic Manufacture (Kenissi) | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 70 Hours | — |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Sapphire | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | 316L Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel & Resin |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Tudor's design language vs Casio's approach
The Tudor Black Bay 58 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 39mm with Domed Sapphire protection. The Casio Vintage A168WA offers Stainless Steel & Resin construction at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Manufacture Calibre MT5402 vs Quartz Module 3298
The Black Bay 58 runs the Automatic Manufacture Calibre MT5402 (In-House Automatic Manufacture (Kenissi), 70 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Vintage A168WA uses the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. The Black Bay 58 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
39mm vs 36.3mm — different wrist presence
At 39mm, the Black Bay 58 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Tudor Black Bay 58 sits at $2,500–$5,000 and the Casio Vintage A168WA at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the Black Bay 58 uses Domed Sapphire with 70 Hours, against Mineral Glass and a standard reserve on the Vintage A168WA. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Black Bay 58 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Vintage A168WA handles 30m (3 ATM). The Black Bay 58 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Tudor
Black Bay 58
Choose the Tudor Black Bay 58 if you prioritize In-House Automatic Manufacture (Kenissi) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $2,500–$5,000, it delivers Automatic Manufacture Calibre MT5402 with 70 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 36.3mm proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz Module 3298 with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Tudor Black Bay 58 and Casio Vintage A168WA represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Tudor bringing Swiss Made tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.