Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Junghans's chronograph meets Maurice Lacroix's diver
Quick Verdict
The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) delivers Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) technology in the tier below the Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope ($2,500–$5,000). The Aikon Automatic measures 42mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Max Bill Chronoscope justifies its premium with Made in Germany heritage and Automatic Caliber J880.2. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope | Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,500–$5,000 | $1,500–$2,500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 42mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber J880.2 | Automatic ML115 |
| Caliber Type | Automatic (ETA 2824-2 base) | Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) |
| Power Reserve | 48 Hours | 38 Hours |
| Water Resistance | Splash Resistant | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Convex Hard Plexiglass (SICRALAN coated) | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Germany | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Junghans's design language vs Maurice Lacroix's approach
The Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Convex Hard Plexiglass (SICRALAN coated) protection. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 42mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber J880.2 vs Automatic ML115
The Max Bill Chronoscope runs the Automatic Caliber J880.2 (Automatic (ETA 2824-2 base), 48 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Aikon Automatic uses the Automatic ML115 (Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base), 38 Hours reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz). The Max Bill Chronoscope edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 42mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Max Bill Chronoscope wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Aikon Automatic at 42mm. Water resistance differs: Splash Resistant vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Maurice Lacroix sits in the lower tier
The Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope sits at $2,500–$5,000 and the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Max Bill Chronoscope uses Convex Hard Plexiglass (SICRALAN coated) with 48 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 38 Hours on the Aikon Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
Splash Resistant vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Max Bill Chronoscope is rated to Splash Resistant while the Aikon Automatic handles 200m (20 ATM). The Aikon Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Materials Face-Off
| Component | Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope | Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Case alloy | Stainless steel 316L. | Medical-grade 316L stainless steel with alloy composition: Fe (~65%), Cr (16–18%), Ni (10–14%), Mo (2–3%), Mn (≤2%), C (≤0.03%). The molybdenum content prevents pitting corrosion in chlorinated and saltwater environments. Mixed finishing — polished bezel arms and case flanks with satin-brushed top surfaces. |
| Crystal | Convex hard plexiglass (acrylic) with SICRALAN scratch-resistant coating — a Junghans proprietary surface treatment that hardens the acrylic and give | Synthetic corundum crystal (Mohs hardness 9, second only to diamond) with multi-layer anti-reflective coating for glare reduction. Virtually scratch-proof in daily wear. |
| Lume specification | Not applicable — the Max Bill dial does not use lume. | Stainless steel integrated links with alternating brushed and polished surfaces. Features Maurice Lacroix's proprietary EasyChange quick-release system — spring-loaded pushers on the case flanks allow strap swaps in seconds without tools. |
| Strap material | Calfskin leather (black, brown variants), nubuck, or Milanese mesh stainless steel bracelet. | Mechanical hobnail (Clous de Paris) pattern pressed into the dial blank before color application. This traditional guilloche-adjacent technique creates a grid of raised pyramidal studs that catch and refract light from every angle. Uncommon at this price point. |
| Super-LumiNova | — | Applied to the hands and hour markers for legibility in the dark. Maurice Lacroix does not publish the Super-LumiNova grade for this reference, so no emission colour or wavelength is stated. |
Cost of Ownership Compared
The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic saves you $472 over 5 years of ownership
Who Should Pick Which
Pick the Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope if…
- Those who prioritize scratch resistance — sapphire crystal
- Chronograph enthusiasts looking for a proven timing instrument
- Dress watch seekers who want understated elegance
- Heritage enthusiasts drawn to ** Junghans's historical pedigree
Pick the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if…
- Enthusiasts wanting the integrated-bracelet luxury sports watch look under $2,000
- Daily wearers who need genuine 200m WR with screw-down crown
- Those who value strap versatility — EasyChange is a genuine differentiator
- Buyers who appreciate fine dial craftsmanship (Clous de Paris) at an accessible price
Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope
- Valjoux 7750 base at a $1,500–$2,500 band price. Some buyers feel the base movement doesn't justify the retail price. The defense: you pay for the design heritage and German assembly, not the movement engineering.
- Acrylic crystal scratches. The SICRALAN coating helps but doesn't make it sapphire-equivalent. Buyers expecting absolute scratch resistance should choose a sapphire-crystal sibling reference.
- No lume. The Max Bill dial is intentionally lume-free — Bauhaus design principles take precedence over practical readability in the dark.
- 14.4mm thickness. The 7750-based Chronoscope is inevitably thick for what reads visually as a slim dress watch. The proportions feel less honest than the 38mm time-only Max Bill Automatic.
Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
- Brand recognition gap: Maurice Lacroix doesn't command the instant recognition of Omega, Tudor, or TAG Heuer. Buyers motivated purely by brand cachet may feel the money is better spent on a more recognizable name.
- 38-hour power reserve: Below average for 2026 — most competitors offer 60–80 hours (Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 offers 80h at 1/3 the price). Skip a day wearing it and you'll need to reset time and date.
- Sellita SW200-1 base movement: A proven workhorse with the ML115 26-jewel upgrade, but not in-house. Enthusiasts who prioritize manufacture movements may view this as a drawback at this price point.
- Grey-market erosion: Heavy grey-market discounting ($1,200–$1,500 vs full retail) undermines the brand's luxury positioning and signals weak demand at MSRP.
Our Verdict
Junghans
Max Bill Chronoscope
Choose the Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope if you prioritize Automatic (ETA 2824-2 base) engineering, Made in Germany craftsmanship, and Splash Resistant water resistance. At $2,500–$5,000, it delivers Automatic Caliber J880.2 with 48 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonMaurice Lacroix
Aikon Automatic
Choose the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if you value Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 42mm proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope and Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Junghans bringing Made in Germany tradition while Maurice Lacroix delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
TAG Heuer Carrera vs Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope
Swiss racing heritage meets German Bauhaus design
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Maurice Lacroix's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope
Tissot's timepiece meets Junghans's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.