Updated
Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Casio MRW-230H
Bulova's diver meets Casio's timepiece
Quick Verdict
The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Casio MRW-230H |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | Under $50 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Resin Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Resin case, aluminum bezel ring |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio MRW-230H offers Resin case, aluminum bezel ring construction at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The MRW-230H uses the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) reserve) at standard. The MRW-230H offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the MRW-230H at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm). Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio MRW-230H at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Resin Glass and Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) on the MRW-230H. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the MRW-230H handles 100m (10 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
MRW-230H
Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Casio MRW-230H represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MRW-230H
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tissot's timepiece meets Bulova's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

