Head-to-Head Comparison

Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1

Bulova's diver meets Casio's timepiece

Quick Verdict

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) and Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 ($500–$1,000) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 emphasizes Miyota Automatic engineering while the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 focuses on Casio (Japan) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350

Bulova

Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350

$500–$1,000

Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1

Casio

Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1

$500–$1,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureBulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1
Price$500–$1,000$500–$1,000
Case Size41mm50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm
MovementAutomatic Miyota 8215Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled
Caliber TypeMiyota AutomaticTough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth
Power Reserve42 HoursTough Solar (Rechargeable)
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)100m (10 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalSapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating
Case MaterialStainless SteelBio-Based Resin / Stainless Steel
OriginMade in Japan (Movement)Casio (Japan)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 offers Bio-Based Resin / Stainless Steel construction at 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Bulova

Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled

The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 uses the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) reserve) at standard. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Bulova

41mm vs 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm — different wrist presence

At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 at 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating and Tough Solar (Rechargeable) on the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Bulova

200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)

The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 handles 100m (10 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350

Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1

Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 if you value Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) offers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve, while the Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 ($500–$1,000) features Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship vs Casio (Japan) engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 emphasizes Miyota Automatic technology while the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 prioritizes Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 at 41mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 at 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm with 100m (10 ATM) is similarly capable. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal while the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.