Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Bulova's diver meets Casio's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Casio Vintage A168WA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | Under $50 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 36.3mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Quartz Module 3298 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | — |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel & Resin |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio Vintage A168WA offers Stainless Steel & Resin construction at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz Module 3298
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Vintage A168WA uses the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 36.3mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio Vintage A168WA at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and a standard reserve on the Vintage A168WA. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Vintage A168WA handles 30m (3 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 36.3mm proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz Module 3298 with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Casio Vintage A168WA represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tissot's timepiece meets Bulova's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.