Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Bulova's diver meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) offers Miyota Automatic precision in the tier below the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 measures 41mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Classic Quartz Moonphase counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Quartz FC-206 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Swiss Quartz |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Frederique Constant's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz FC-206
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Classic Quartz Moonphase uses the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Classic Quartz Moonphase at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal and Battery on the Classic Quartz Moonphase. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Classic Quartz Moonphase handles 50m (5 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonFrederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you value Swiss Quartz technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Frederique Constant delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tissot's timepiece meets Bulova's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.