Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Two divers compared — $500–$1,000 vs $1,000–$1,500
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) offers Miyota Automatic precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 measures 41mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 40.5mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Automatic 6R35 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Automatic 6R35
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)
Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.