Bulova Surveyor Automatic vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1
Bulova's dress watch meets Casio's timepiece
Quick Verdict
The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 ($150–$250) delivers Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) technology in the tier below the Bulova Surveyor Automatic ($250–$500). The Pro Trek PRG270-1 measures 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Surveyor Automatic justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Surveyor Automatic | Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $150–$250 |
| Case Size | 39mm | 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | Tough Solar (Rechargeable) |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Resin |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 39mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 offers Resin construction at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Tough Solar (Solar Quartz)
The Surveyor Automatic runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Pro Trek PRG270-1 uses the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) (Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change), Tough Solar (Rechargeable) reserve) at standard. The Surveyor Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
39mm vs 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm — different wrist presence
At 39mm, the Surveyor Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Trek PRG270-1 at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic sits at $250–$500 and the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 at $150–$250. On the specs that outlast any price: the Surveyor Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Tough Solar (Rechargeable) on the Pro Trek PRG270-1. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Surveyor Automatic is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Pro Trek PRG270-1 handles 100m (10 ATM). The Pro Trek PRG270-1 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Surveyor Automatic
Choose the Bulova Surveyor Automatic if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Pro Trek PRG270-1
Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 if you value Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm proportions. At $150–$250, the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic and Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Surveyor Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Surveyor Automatic
Tissot's timepiece meets Bulova's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.