Bulova Surveyor Automatic vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Bulova's dress watch meets Seiko's diver
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic ($250–$500) offers Miyota Automatic precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Surveyor Automatic measures 39mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Surveyor Automatic | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 39mm | 40.5mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Automatic 6R35 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 39mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Automatic 6R35
The Surveyor Automatic runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
39mm vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence
At 39mm, the Surveyor Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic sits at $250–$500 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Surveyor Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Surveyor Automatic is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Surveyor Automatic
Choose the Bulova Surveyor Automatic if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)
Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Surveyor Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.