Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio Duro MDV106 Black vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Casio's diver meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Casio Duro MDV106 Black ($50–$100) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150). The Duro MDV106 Black measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The 1920s Retrograde counters with Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Duro MDV106 Black

Casio

Duro MDV106 Black

$50–$100

Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Duro MDV106 BlackStauer 1920s Retrograde
Price$50–$100$100–$150
Case Size44mm43mm
MovementQuartz Module 2784Quartz
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)Quartz
Power Reserve3-Year BatteryBattery
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM) Diver100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
CrystalMineral GlassMineral crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelGold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
OriginCasio (Japan)Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Casio Duro MDV106 Black features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Quartz Module 2784 vs Quartz

The Duro MDV106 Black runs the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Duro MDV106 Black edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Stauer

44mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 44mm, the Duro MDV106 Black has a bolder wrist presence compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Duro MDV106 Black sits at $50–$100 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Duro MDV106 Black uses Mineral Glass with 3-Year Battery, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Duro MDV106 Black is rated to 200m (20 ATM) Diver while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Duro MDV106 Black is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

Duro MDV106 Black

Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 Black if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Duro MDV106 Black and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio Duro MDV106 Black is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio Duro MDV106 Black sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $100–$150), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Casio Duro MDV106 Black offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Duro MDV106 Black at 44mm with 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Duro MDV106 Black uses Mineral Glass while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.