Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio F-91W vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Casio's timepiece meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Casio F-91W (Under $50) offers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150). The F-91W measures 35mm and is rated 30m (Splash Resistant). The 1920s Retrograde counters with Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

CasioF-91WUnder $50 Check price Stauer1920s Retrograde$100–$150 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

F-91W

Under $50

Check Price Full Review

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio F-91W	Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Price	Under $50	$100–$150
Case Size	35mm	43mm
Movement	Quartz Module 593	Quartz
Caliber Type	Casio Digital Quartz (Battery)	Quartz
Power Reserve	7-Year Battery	Battery
Water Resistance	30m (Splash Resistant)	100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
Crystal	Acrylic	Mineral crystal
Case Material	Resin	Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Casio F-91W features a Resin case at 35mm with Acrylic protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Quartz Module 593 vs Quartz

The F-91W runs the Quartz Module 593 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 7-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The F-91W edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

35mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 35mm, the F-91W wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (Splash Resistant) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio F-91W sits at Under $50 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the F-91W uses Acrylic with 7-Year Battery, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Stauer

30m (Splash Resistant) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The F-91W is rated to 30m (Splash Resistant) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The 1920s Retrograde offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

F-91W

Choose the Casio F-91W if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 593 with 7-Year Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio F-91W and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is rated 100 m against 30 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio F-91W sits a band lower (Under $50 against $100–$150), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Casio F-91W offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The F-91W at 35mm with 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The F-91W uses Acrylic while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio F-91W

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio F-91W

Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs Under $50

Explore These Watches

Casio F-91W — Full Review Stauer 1920s Retrograde — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.