Updated
Casio MRW-230H vs Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80
Casio's timepiece meets Tissot's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 counters with Swiss Made (Swatch Group) craftsmanship and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MRW-230H | Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) | 39.3mm |
| Movement | Quartz | Powermatic 80.111 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | ETA-Based Automatic |
| Power Reserve | Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Resin Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Resin case, aluminum bezel ring | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made (Swatch Group) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers Stainless Steel construction at 39.3mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz vs Powermatic 80.111
The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Le Locle Powermatic 80 uses the Powermatic 80.111 (ETA-Based Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 39.3mm — different wrist presence
At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Le Locle Powermatic 80 at 39.3mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Le Locle Powermatic 80. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Le Locle Powermatic 80 handles 30m (3 ATM). The MRW-230H is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
MRW-230H
Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Le Locle Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 if you value ETA-Based Automatic technology, Swiss Made (Swatch Group) heritage, and 39.3mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio MRW-230H and Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made (Swatch Group) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

