Updated
Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Casio's field watch meets Casio's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The MTP-S120L Solar Field justifies its premium with Casio (Japan) heritage and Solar-Powered Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field | Casio Vintage A168WA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $100–$150 | Under $50 |
| Case Size | 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) | 36.3mm |
| Movement | Solar-Powered Quartz | Quartz Module 3298 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Tough Solar Quartz | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement | — |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel & Resin |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Casio's approach
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Casio Vintage A168WA offers Stainless Steel & Resin construction at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Solar-Powered Quartz vs Quartz Module 3298
The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Vintage A168WA uses the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 36.3mm — different wrist presence
At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Casio Vintage A168WA at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Mineral Glass and a standard reserve on the Vintage A168WA. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Vintage A168WA handles 30m (3 ATM). The MTP-S120L Solar Field is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
MTP-S120L Solar Field
Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 36.3mm proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz Module 3298 with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Casio Vintage A168WA represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's field watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's field watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.