Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Vintage A168WA vs Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square

Casio's chronograph meets Casio's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) and Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Vintage A168WA emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering while the G-Shock DW-5600 Square focuses on Casio (Japan) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square

Casio

G-Shock DW-5600 Square

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Vintage A168WACasio G-Shock DW-5600 Square
PriceUnder $50$50–$100
Case Size36.3mm42.8mm (Square)
MovementQuartz Module 3298Quartz Module 3229
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)Casio Digital Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve2-Year Battery
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless Steel & ResinResin
OriginMade in JapanCasio (Japan)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Casio's approach

The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square offers Resin construction at 42.8mm (Square) with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Quartz Module 3298 vs Quartz Module 3229

The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses the Quartz Module 3229 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 2-Year Battery reserve) at standard. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

36.3mm vs 42.8mm (Square) — different wrist presence

At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the G-Shock DW-5600 Square at 42.8mm (Square). Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Mineral Glass and 2-Year Battery on the G-Shock DW-5600 Square. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the G-Shock DW-5600 Square handles 200m (20 ATM). The G-Shock DW-5600 Square offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

G-Shock DW-5600 Square

Choose the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square if you value Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 42.8mm (Square) proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Module 3229 with 2-Year Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Vintage A168WA and Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 3298 with reliable power reserve, while the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square ($50–$100) features Quartz Module 3229 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Casio (Japan) engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Vintage A168WA emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) technology while the G-Shock DW-5600 Square prioritizes Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square at 42.8mm (Square) with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Mineral Glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.