Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Vintage A168WA vs Invicta Pro Diver Automatic

Casio's chronograph meets Invicta's diver

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) and Invicta Pro Diver Automatic ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Vintage A168WA emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering while the Pro Diver Automatic focuses on Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Vintage A168WAInvicta Pro Diver Automatic
PriceUnder $50$50–$100
Case Size36.3mm40mm
MovementQuartz Module 3298Automatic Seiko NH35
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve41 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless Steel & ResinStainless Steel
OriginMade in JapanJapanese Movement (Seiko NH35)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Invicta's approach

The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Invicta

Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic Seiko NH35

The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Pro Diver Automatic uses the Automatic Seiko NH35 (Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 41 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Pro Diver Automatic offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

36.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Diver Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Mineral Glass and 41 Hours on the Pro Diver Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Invicta

30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Pro Diver Automatic handles 200m (20 ATM). The Pro Diver Automatic offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic

Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic if you value Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Automatic Seiko NH35 with 41 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Vintage A168WA and Invicta Pro Diver Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Invicta delivers Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 3298 with reliable power reserve, while the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic ($50–$100) features Automatic Seiko NH35 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Vintage A168WA emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) technology while the Pro Diver Automatic prioritizes Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Pro Diver Automatic at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Mineral Glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.