Casio Vintage A168WA vs Rado True Square Automatic
Casio's chronograph meets Rado's timepiece
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The True Square Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Rado True Square Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $1,500–$2,500 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 38mm (Square) |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Automatic ETA C07.611 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) |
| Power Reserve | — | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Rado's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Rado True Square Automatic offers Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic construction at 38mm (Square) with Sapphire (Anti-Reflective). Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic ETA C07.611
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The True Square Automatic uses the Automatic ETA C07.611 (Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based), 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The True Square Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 38mm (Square) — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the True Square Automatic at 38mm (Square). Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Rado True Square Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) and 80 Hours on the True Square Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the True Square Automatic handles 50m (5 ATM). The True Square Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonRado
True Square Automatic
Choose the Rado True Square Automatic if you value Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm (Square) proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ETA C07.611 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Rado True Square Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Rado delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Rado True Square Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Rado's timepiece
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.