Head-to-Head Comparison

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA

Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Powermatic 80.111. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80

Tissot

PRX Powermatic 80

$500–$1,000

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Specifications Compared

FeatureTissot PRX Powermatic 80Casio Vintage A168WA
Price$500–$1,000Under $50
Case Size40mm36.3mm
MovementAutomatic Powermatic 80.111Quartz Module 3298
Caliber TypeIn-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base)Casio Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve80 Hours
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)30m (3 ATM)
CrystalScratch-resistant SapphireMineral Glass
Case Material316L Stainless SteelStainless Steel & Resin
OriginSwiss MadeMade in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Tissot's design language vs Casio's approach

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Scratch-resistant Sapphire protection. The Casio Vintage A168WA offers Stainless Steel & Resin construction at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Tissot

Automatic Powermatic 80.111 vs Quartz Module 3298

The PRX Powermatic 80 runs the Automatic Powermatic 80.111 (In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Vintage A168WA uses the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. The PRX Powermatic 80 edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

40mm vs 36.3mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the PRX Powermatic 80 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio Vintage A168WA at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and a standard reserve on the Vintage A168WA. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Tissot

100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)

The PRX Powermatic 80 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Vintage A168WA handles 30m (3 ATM). The PRX Powermatic 80 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Tissot

PRX Powermatic 80

Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you prioritize In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 36.3mm proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz Module 3298 with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 and Casio Vintage A168WA represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Tissot bringing Swiss Made tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000) offers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve, while the Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) features Quartz Module 3298 with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Swiss Made craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.
The Casio Vintage A168WA offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The PRX Powermatic 80 at 40mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) is similarly capable. The PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire while the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.