Omega Speedmaster Professional vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $5,000–$10,000 vs Under $50
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Omega Speedmaster Professional ($5,000–$10,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Speedmaster Professional justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Manual-Winding Caliber 3861. Both represent excellent choices in the chronograph category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Omega Speedmaster Professional | Casio Vintage A168WA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5,000–$10,000 | Under $50 |
| Case Size | 42mm | 36.3mm |
| Movement | Manual-Winding Caliber 3861 | Quartz Module 3298 |
| Caliber Type | In-House Manual-Winding Manufacture (Co-Axial) | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 50 Hours | — |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Hesalite or Sapphire | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel & Resin |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Omega's design language vs Casio's approach
The Omega Speedmaster Professional features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm with Hesalite or Sapphire protection. The Casio Vintage A168WA offers Stainless Steel & Resin construction at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Manual-Winding Caliber 3861 vs Quartz Module 3298
The Speedmaster Professional runs the Manual-Winding Caliber 3861 (In-House Manual-Winding Manufacture (Co-Axial), 50 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Vintage A168WA uses the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard reserve) at standard. The Speedmaster Professional edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
42mm vs 36.3mm — different wrist presence
At 42mm, the Speedmaster Professional has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Omega Speedmaster Professional sits at $5,000–$10,000 and the Casio Vintage A168WA at Under $50. On the specs that outlast any price: the Speedmaster Professional uses Hesalite or Sapphire with 50 Hours, against Mineral Glass and a standard reserve on the Vintage A168WA. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Speedmaster Professional is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Vintage A168WA handles 30m (3 ATM). The Speedmaster Professional is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Omega
Speedmaster Professional
Choose the Omega Speedmaster Professional if you prioritize In-House Manual-Winding Manufacture (Co-Axial) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $5,000–$10,000, it delivers Manual-Winding Caliber 3861 with 50 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 36.3mm proportions. At Under $50, the Quartz Module 3298 with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Omega Speedmaster Professional and Casio Vintage A168WA represent two distinct approaches to the chronograph category — the Omega bringing Swiss Made tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Omega Speedmaster vs Breitling Navitimer
The Moon Watch meets the Pilot's Chronograph
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Omega Speedmaster Professional
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $5,000–$10,000
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.