Casio Vintage A168WA vs Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300
Casio's chronograph meets Tag Heuer's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300 ($2,500–$5,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Aquaracer Professional 300 counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $2,500–$5,000 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 43mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Automatic Caliber 5 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Automatic (ETA 2824-2 / Sellita SW200 base) |
| Power Reserve | — | 38 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tag Heuer's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300 offers Stainless Steel construction at 43mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic Caliber 5
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Aquaracer Professional 300 uses the Automatic Caliber 5 (Automatic (ETA 2824-2 / Sellita SW200 base), 38 Hours reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz). The Aquaracer Professional 300 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Aquaracer Professional 300 at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300 at $2,500–$5,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating and 38 Hours on the Aquaracer Professional 300. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Aquaracer Professional 300 handles 300m (30 ATM). The Aquaracer Professional 300 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTag Heuer
Aquaracer Professional 300
Choose the Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300 if you value Automatic (ETA 2824-2 / Sellita SW200 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $2,500–$5,000, the Automatic Caliber 5 with 38 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Tag Heuer delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tag Heuer Aquaracer Professional 300
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tag Heuer's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.