Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Vintage A168WA vs Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium

Casio's chronograph meets Tissot's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium counters with Swiss Made (Swatch Group) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Vintage A168WA

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Under $50

Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium

Tissot

Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium

$500–$1,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Vintage A168WATissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium
PriceUnder $50$500–$1,000
Case Size36.3mm40mm
MovementQuartz Module 3298Powermatic 80.811 (Silicon Hairspring)
Caliber TypeCasio Quartz (Battery)ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Hairspring
Power Reserve80 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)100m (10 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless Steel & ResinStainless Steel
OriginMade in JapanSwiss Made (Swatch Group)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach

The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Tissot

Quartz Module 3298 vs Powermatic 80.811 (Silicon Hairspring)

The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium uses the Powermatic 80.811 (Silicon Hairspring) (ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Hairspring, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

36.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Tissot

30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)

The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium handles 100m (10 ATM). The Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Casio

Vintage A168WA

Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Tissot

Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium

Choose the Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium if you value ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Hairspring technology, Swiss Made (Swatch Group) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Powermatic 80.811 (Silicon Hairspring) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Vintage A168WA and Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made (Swatch Group) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Quartz Module 3298 with reliable power reserve, while the Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium ($500–$1,000) features Powermatic 80.811 (Silicon Hairspring) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan craftsmanship vs Swiss Made (Swatch Group) engineering.
The Casio Vintage A168WA offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at Under $50. However, the Tissot Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Vintage A168WA at 36.3mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium at 40mm with 100m (10 ATM) is similarly capable. The Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass while the Gentleman Powermatic 80 Silicium uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.