Casio Vintage A168WA vs Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80
Casio's chronograph meets Tissot's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 counters with Swiss Made (Swatch Group) craftsmanship and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 39.3mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Powermatic 80.111 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | ETA-Based Automatic |
| Power Reserve | — | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made (Swatch Group) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers Stainless Steel construction at 39.3mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Powermatic 80.111
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Le Locle Powermatic 80 uses the Powermatic 80.111 (ETA-Based Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Le Locle Powermatic 80 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 39.3mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Le Locle Powermatic 80 at 39.3mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Le Locle Powermatic 80. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Le Locle Powermatic 80 handles 30m (3 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Le Locle Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 if you value ETA-Based Automatic technology, Swiss Made (Swatch Group) heritage, and 39.3mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made (Swatch Group) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Tissot Le Locle
Wind it yourself, or let it wind itself
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tissot Le Locle Powermatic 80
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tissot's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.