Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Citizen's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph ($150–$250). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph justifies its premium with Japanese Movement heritage and Eco-Drive Caliber H500. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph

Citizen

Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph

$150–$250

Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureCitizen Eco-Drive Weekender ChronographStauer 1920s Retrograde
Price$150–$250$100–$150
Case Size43mm43mm
MovementEco-Drive Caliber H500Quartz
Caliber TypeCitizen Eco-Drive Solar QuartzQuartz
Power ReserveBattery
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
CrystalMineral CrystalMineral crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelGold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
OriginJapanese MovementStauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Citizen's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 43mm with Mineral Crystal protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Eco-Drive Caliber H500 vs Quartz

The Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph runs the Eco-Drive Caliber H500 (Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Draw

43mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 43mm, the Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph is similarly sized compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Stauer

Stauer sits in the lower tier

The Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph sits at $150–$250 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph uses Mineral Crystal with a standard reserve, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Citizen

Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph

Choose the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph if you prioritize Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $150–$250, it delivers Eco-Drive Caliber H500 with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Citizen bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

On price, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $150–$250), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Eco-Drive Weekender Chronograph uses Mineral Crystal while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.