Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase vs Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic
Frederique Constant's dress watch meets Hamilton's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic ($500–$1,000) delivers Automatic (ETA C07.611 base) technology in the tier below the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500). The Khaki Field Automatic measures 38mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Classic Quartz Moonphase justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Quartz FC-206. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase | Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 38mm |
| Movement | Quartz FC-206 | Automatic H-10 |
| Caliber Type | Swiss Quartz | Automatic (ETA C07.611 base) |
| Power Reserve | Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Frederique Constant's design language vs Hamilton's approach
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal protection. The Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 38mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz FC-206 vs Automatic H-10
The Classic Quartz Moonphase runs the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Khaki Field Automatic uses the Automatic H-10 (Automatic (ETA C07.611 base), 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Khaki Field Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 38mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Classic Quartz Moonphase has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Khaki Field Automatic at 38mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Hamilton sits in the lower tier
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal with Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Khaki Field Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Khaki Field Automatic handles 100m (10 ATM). The Khaki Field Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Frederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you prioritize Swiss Quartz engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonHamilton
Khaki Field Automatic
Choose the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic if you value Automatic (ETA C07.611 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 38mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic H-10 with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase and Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Frederique Constant bringing Swiss Made tradition while Hamilton delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tissot PRX vs Hamilton Khaki Field
Integrated bracelet sophistication meets military heritage
Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic vs Seiko 5 Sports
Same 100m rating, roughly triple the price
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.