Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase vs Mido Ocean Star GMT
Frederique Constant's dress watch meets Mido's diver
Quick Verdict
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500) and Mido Ocean Star GMT ($1,000–$1,500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Quartz Moonphase emphasizes Swiss Quartz engineering while the Ocean Star GMT focuses on Swiss Made craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase | Mido Ocean Star GMT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 44mm |
| Movement | Quartz FC-206 | Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) |
| Caliber Type | Swiss Quartz | Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) |
| Power Reserve | Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire with Double-sided AR |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Frederique Constant's design language vs Mido's approach
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal protection. The Mido Ocean Star GMT offers Stainless Steel construction at 44mm with Sapphire with Double-sided AR. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz FC-206 vs Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase runs the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Ocean Star GMT uses the Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) (Automatic (ETA C07.661 base), 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Ocean Star GMT offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 44mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Classic Quartz Moonphase wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Ocean Star GMT at 44mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Mido Ocean Star GMT at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal with Battery, against Sapphire with Double-sided AR and 80 Hours on the Ocean Star GMT. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Ocean Star GMT handles 200m (20 ATM). The Ocean Star GMT offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Frederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you prioritize Swiss Quartz engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonMido
Ocean Star GMT
Choose the Mido Ocean Star GMT if you value Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 44mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase and Mido Ocean Star GMT represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Frederique Constant bringing Swiss Made tradition while Mido delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Mido Ocean Star GMT
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Mido's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tissot's timepiece meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.