Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Two dress watchs compared — $1,000–$1,500 vs $100–$150

Quick Verdict

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Classic Quartz Moonphase justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Quartz FC-206. Both represent excellent choices in the dress watch category.

Frederique ConstantClassic Quartz Moonphase$1,000–$1,500 Check price Stauer1920s Retrograde$100–$150 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Frederique Constant

Classic Quartz Moonphase

$1,000–$1,500

Check Price Full Review

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase	Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Price	$1,000–$1,500	$100–$150
Case Size	40mm	43mm
Movement	Quartz FC-206	Quartz
Caliber Type	Swiss Quartz	Quartz
Power Reserve	Battery	Battery
Water Resistance	50m (5 ATM)	100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
Crystal	Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal	Mineral crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
Origin	Swiss Made	Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Frederique Constant's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Quartz FC-206 vs Quartz

The Classic Quartz Moonphase runs the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Frederique Constant

40mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Classic Quartz Moonphase wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Stauer

Stauer sits in the lower tier

The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal with Battery, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Stauer

50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Classic Quartz Moonphase is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The 1920s Retrograde offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Frederique Constant

Classic Quartz Moonphase

Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you prioritize Swiss Quartz engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to the dress watch category — the Frederique Constant bringing Swiss Made tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Classic Quartz Moonphase at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase

Tissot's timepiece meets Frederique Constant's dress watch

Explore These Watches

Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase — Full Review Stauer 1920s Retrograde — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.