Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square vs Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Two divers compared — $50–$100 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square ($50–$100) offers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 ($500–$1,000). The G-Shock DW-5600 Square measures 42.8mm (Square) and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square | Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 42.8mm (Square) | 41.7mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3229 | Automatic Caliber 4R35 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 2-Year Battery | 41 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Hardlex Crystal |
| Case Material | Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square features a Resin case at 42.8mm (Square) with Mineral Glass protection. The Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 offers Stainless Steel construction at 41.7mm with Hardlex Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3229 vs Automatic Caliber 4R35
The G-Shock DW-5600 Square runs the Quartz Module 3229 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 2-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 uses the Automatic Caliber 4R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 41 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
42.8mm (Square) vs 41.7mm — different wrist presence
At 42.8mm (Square), the G-Shock DW-5600 Square has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Prospex Samurai SRPL13 at 41.7mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square sits at $50–$100 and the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses Mineral Glass with 2-Year Battery, against Hardlex Crystal and 41 Hours on the Prospex Samurai SRPL13. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The G-Shock DW-5600 Square is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Prospex Samurai SRPL13 handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
G-Shock DW-5600 Square
Choose the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 3229 with 2-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Choose the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 41.7mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Caliber 4R35 with 41 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square and Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.