Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Casio's diver meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square ($50–$100) offers Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150). The G-Shock DW-5600 Square measures 42.8mm (Square) and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The 1920s Retrograde counters with Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square

Casio

G-Shock DW-5600 Square

$50–$100

Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio G-Shock DW-5600 SquareStauer 1920s Retrograde
Price$50–$100$100–$150
Case Size42.8mm (Square)43mm
MovementQuartz Module 3229Quartz
Caliber TypeCasio Digital Quartz (Battery)Quartz
Power Reserve2-Year BatteryBattery
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
CrystalMineral GlassMineral crystal
Case MaterialResinGold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
OriginCasio (Japan)Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square features a Resin case at 42.8mm (Square) with Mineral Glass protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Quartz Module 3229 vs Quartz

The G-Shock DW-5600 Square runs the Quartz Module 3229 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 2-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Casio

42.8mm (Square) vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 42.8mm (Square), the G-Shock DW-5600 Square wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square sits at $50–$100 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses Mineral Glass with 2-Year Battery, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The G-Shock DW-5600 Square is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

G-Shock DW-5600 Square

Choose the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 3229 with 2-Year Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $100–$150), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square at 42.8mm (Square) with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses Mineral Glass while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.