Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph vs Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $1,000–$1,500
Quick Verdict
The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer ($1,000–$1,500) delivers Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic technology in the tier below the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph ($2,500–$5,000). The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer measures 40mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic H-31. Both represent excellent choices in the chronograph category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph | Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,500–$5,000 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic H-31 | Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) |
| Caliber Type | Valjoux-Based Automatic Chronograph | Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 60 Hours | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire (Domed) | Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Hamilton's design language vs Mido's approach
The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire (Domed) protection. The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic H-31 vs Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC)
The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph runs the Automatic H-31 (Valjoux-Based Automatic Chronograph, 60 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer uses the Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) (Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph is similarly sized compared to the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Mido sits in the lower tier
The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph sits at $2,500–$5,000 and the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph uses Sapphire (Domed) with 60 Hours, against Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating and 80 Hours on the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer handles 100m (10 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Materials Face-Off
| Component | Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph | Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer |
|---|---|---|
| Movement | Hamilton H-31 caliber | Stainless steel 316L (medical-grade, composition Cr 16–18%, Ni 10–14%, Mo 2–3%). Standard mid-range Swiss spec — not 904L. The three-part case constr |
| Crystal | Domed sapphire ("box crystal" silhouette) | Synthetic sapphire (Al₂O₃) grown via Verneuil process, Mohs 9. Box shape (domed beyond the bezel ring) — adds vintage character. Anti-reflective coat Mohs 9 |
| Case | Stainless steel 316L | Super-LumiNova on the hands and markers; the 12 peripheral dots give an orientation cue at a glance. Grade and glow duration are not published by the manufacturer for this reference, so neither is claimed here. |
| Bracelet alloy | — | Stainless steel 316L matching the case. |
| Dial finishing | — | Midnight blue lacquer with combined sunray and satin finishing techniques. |
Cost of Ownership Compared
The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer saves you $895 over 5 years of ownership
Who Should Pick Which
Pick the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph if…
- Active lifestyle wearers — 100m water resistance handles swimming and water sports
- Practical daily wearers — 60-hour reserve gives breathing room
- Those who prioritize scratch resistance — sapphire crystal
- Chronograph enthusiasts looking for a proven timing instrument
- Heritage enthusiasts drawn to ** Hamilton's historical pedigree
Pick the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer if…
- Enthusiasts wanting proven Swiss/Japanese quality in the $1,000–$2,000 sweet spot
- Accuracy-minded buyers — COSC chronometer certification guarantees precision
- Those who prioritize scratch resistance — sapphire crystal
- Dress watch seekers who want understated elegance
- Heritage enthusiasts drawn to ** Mido's historical pedigree
Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph
- 14.6mm thickness honest but tall.
- Not column-wheel — cam-switching 7753 architecture.
- H-31 isn't in-house in the strict sense.
- Lume is modest.
Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer
- ETA 2836-2 base at a $1,500–$2,500 band retail — many enthusiasts feel the brand premium is high vs. peers with similar movement architecture in the $500–$1,000 band (Hamilton, Tissot).
- 38-hour power reserve — modest by 2026 standards where peers offer 70–80 hours.
- 50m water resistance — limited dress-sport spec; not for swimming/diving.
- 21mm lug width — awkward for aftermarket strap fitment (most aftermarket is 20mm or 22mm).
Our Verdict
Hamilton
Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph
Choose the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph if you prioritize Valjoux-Based Automatic Chronograph engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $2,500–$5,000, it delivers Automatic H-31 with 60 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonMido
Multifort Powerwind Chronometer
Choose the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer if you value Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph and Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer represent two distinct approaches to the chronograph category — the Hamilton bringing Swiss Made tradition while Mido delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono
Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage
Mido Multifort vs Tissot Gentleman
Two 40mm Swiss automatics, one of them certified
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $2,500–$5,000
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.