Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Invicta's diver meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic ($50–$100) offers Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150). The Pro Diver Automatic measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The 1920s Retrograde counters with Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic

$50–$100

Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureInvicta Pro Diver AutomaticStauer 1920s Retrograde
Price$50–$100$100–$150
Case Size40mm43mm
MovementAutomatic Seiko NH35Quartz
Caliber TypeSeiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)Quartz
Power Reserve41 HoursBattery
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
CrystalMineral GlassMineral crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelGold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
OriginJapanese Movement (Seiko NH35)Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Invicta's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Invicta

Automatic Seiko NH35 vs Quartz

The Pro Diver Automatic runs the Automatic Seiko NH35 (Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 41 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Pro Diver Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Invicta

40mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Invicta

Invicta sits in the lower tier

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic sits at $50–$100 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic uses Mineral Glass with 41 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Invicta

200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Pro Diver Automatic is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Pro Diver Automatic is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic

Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic if you prioritize Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic Seiko NH35 with 41 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Invicta bringing Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $100–$150), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Diver Automatic at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Pro Diver Automatic uses Mineral Glass while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.