Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Junghans's design language vs Orient's approach

The Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Convex Hard Plexiglass (SICRALAN coated) protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

Automatic Caliber J880.2 vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Max Bill Chronoscope runs the Automatic Caliber J880.2 (Automatic (ETA 2824-2 base), 48 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Max Bill Chronoscope edges ahead on power reserve.

40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Max Bill Chronoscope is similarly sized compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: Splash Resistant vs 200m (20 ATM).

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Junghans Max Bill Chronoscope sits at $2,500–$5,000 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Max Bill Chronoscope uses Convex Hard Plexiglass (SICRALAN coated) with 48 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

Splash Resistant vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Max Bill Chronoscope is rated to Splash Resistant while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.