Head-to-Head Comparison

Longines HydroConquest Automatic vs Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Two divers compared — $1,500–$2,500 vs $1,500–$2,500

Quick Verdict

The Longines HydroConquest Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) and Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) are closely matched divers at similar price points. The HydroConquest Automatic emphasizes ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring engineering while the Aikon Automatic focuses on Swiss Made craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Longines HydroConquest Automatic

Longines

HydroConquest Automatic

$1,500–$2,500

Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

$1,500–$2,500

Specifications Compared

FeatureLongines HydroConquest AutomaticMaurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Price$1,500–$2,500$1,500–$2,500
Case Size41mm42mm
MovementAutomatic L888.5Automatic ML115
Caliber TypeETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance SpringAutomatic (Sellita SW200-1 base)
Power Reserve72 Hours38 Hours
Water Resistance300m (30 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalSapphire with Anti-Reflective CoatingSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
OriginSwiss MadeSwiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Longines's design language vs Maurice Lacroix's approach

The Longines HydroConquest Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating protection. The Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 42mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Longines

Automatic L888.5 vs Automatic ML115

The HydroConquest Automatic runs the Automatic L888.5 (ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring, 72 Hours power reserve) at 25,200 vph (3.5 Hz) frequency. The Aikon Automatic uses the Automatic ML115 (Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base), 38 Hours reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz). The HydroConquest Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Longines

41mm vs 42mm — different wrist presence

At 41mm, the HydroConquest Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Aikon Automatic at 42mm. Water resistance differs: 300m (30 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Longines HydroConquest Automatic sits at $1,500–$2,500 and the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the HydroConquest Automatic uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating with 72 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 38 Hours on the Aikon Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Longines

300m (30 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The HydroConquest Automatic is rated to 300m (30 ATM) while the Aikon Automatic handles 200m (20 ATM). The HydroConquest Automatic is better suited for water activities.

Materials Face-Off

ComponentLongines HydroConquest AutomaticMaurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic
Ceramic Bezel

Zirconium oxide (ZrO₂) with engraved and paint-filled 60-minute dive scale

Mohs 8.5

Medical-grade 316L stainless steel with alloy composition: Fe (~65%), Cr (16–18%), Ni (10–14%), Mo (2–3%), Mn (≤2%), C (≤0.03%). The molybdenum content prevents pitting corrosion in chlorinated and saltwater environments. Mixed finishing — polished bezel arms and case flanks with satin-brushed top surfaces.

Sapphire Crystal

Flat sapphire with anti-reflective coating on the underside

Mohs 9

Synthetic corundum crystal (Mohs hardness 9, second only to diamond) with multi-layer anti-reflective coating for glare reduction. Virtually scratch-proof in daily wear.

Silicon Balance Spring

Si hairspring in the L888.5 caliber — introduced 2020 across the HydroConquest line

Stainless steel integrated links with alternating brushed and polished surfaces. Features Maurice Lacroix's proprietary EasyChange quick-release system — spring-loaded pushers on the case flanks allow strap swaps in seconds without tools.

316L Stainless Steel

Brushed flanks with polished bevel edges — mixed finishing for visual depth

Mechanical hobnail (Clous de Paris) pattern pressed into the dial blank before color application. This traditional guilloche-adjacent technique creates a grid of raised pyramidal studs that catch and refract light from every angle. Uncommon at this price point.

Super-LumiNova

Applied to sword-style hands and all hour indices

Applied to the hands and hour markers for legibility in the dark. Maurice Lacroix does not publish the Super-LumiNova grade for this reference, so no emission colour or wavelength is stated.

Cost of Ownership Compared

1 yr5 yr10 yr
Longines HydroConquest Automatic$2,281
$1.25/day
Purchase: $1,750Service: $400Insurance: $131
Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic$2,343
$1.28/day
Purchase: $1,900Service: $300Insurance: $143

The Longines HydroConquest Automatic saves you $62 over 5 years of ownership

Who Should Pick Which

Pick the Longines HydroConquest Automatic if…

  • Best-in-class 72-hour power reserve at sub-$2,000
  • Silicon hairspring antimagnetic protection at an accessible price
  • Swiss heritage enthusiasts — Longines' 1832 founding and Olympic/aviation history
  • Legitimate 300m dive capability with everyday wearability
  • Value seekers — at grey-market pricing the spec-per-dollar is nearly unbeatable

Pick the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if…

  • Enthusiasts wanting the integrated-bracelet luxury sports watch look under $2,000
  • Daily wearers who need genuine 200m WR with screw-down crown
  • Those who value strap versatility — EasyChange is a genuine differentiator
  • Buyers who appreciate fine dial craftsmanship (Clous de Paris) at an accessible price

Longines HydroConquest Automatic

  • ETA-base movement at this price — excellent but not "in-house" in the purist sense
  • 21mm lug width — awkward for aftermarket straps (most are 20mm or 22mm)
  • 25,200 vph (3.5 Hz) — seconds hand sweep is less smooth than 28,800 vph competitors
  • Not COSC-certified — no chronometer guarantee (unlike Tudor or Omega at similar prices)

Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic

  • Brand recognition gap: Maurice Lacroix doesn't command the instant recognition of Omega, Tudor, or TAG Heuer. Buyers motivated purely by brand cachet may feel the money is better spent on a more recognizable name.
  • 38-hour power reserve: Below average for 2026 — most competitors offer 60–80 hours (Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 offers 80h at 1/3 the price). Skip a day wearing it and you'll need to reset time and date.
  • Sellita SW200-1 base movement: A proven workhorse with the ML115 26-jewel upgrade, but not in-house. Enthusiasts who prioritize manufacture movements may view this as a drawback at this price point.
  • Grey-market erosion: Heavy grey-market discounting ($1,200–$1,500 vs full retail) undermines the brand's luxury positioning and signals weak demand at MSRP.

Our Verdict

Longines

HydroConquest Automatic

Choose the Longines HydroConquest Automatic if you prioritize ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. At $1,500–$2,500, it delivers Automatic L888.5 with 72 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Maurice Lacroix

Aikon Automatic

Choose the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic if you value Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 42mm proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic ML115 with 38 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Longines HydroConquest Automatic and Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Longines bringing Swiss Made tradition while Maurice Lacroix delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Longines HydroConquest Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) offers Automatic L888.5 with 72 Hours power reserve, while the Maurice Lacroix Aikon Automatic ($1,500–$2,500) features Automatic ML115 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Swiss Made craftsmanship vs Swiss Made engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The HydroConquest Automatic emphasizes ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring technology while the Aikon Automatic prioritizes Automatic (Sellita SW200-1 base) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The HydroConquest Automatic at 41mm with 300m (30 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Aikon Automatic at 42mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The HydroConquest Automatic uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating while the Aikon Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.