Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Mido's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer ($1,000–$1,500). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC). Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

MidoMultifort Powerwind Chronometer$1,000–$1,500 Check price Stauer1920s Retrograde$100–$150 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Mido

Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

$1,000–$1,500

Check Price Full Review

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer	Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Price	$1,000–$1,500	$100–$150
Case Size	40mm	43mm
Movement	Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC)	Quartz
Caliber Type	Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic	Quartz
Power Reserve	80 Hours	Battery
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM)	100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
Crystal	Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating	Mineral crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
Origin	Swiss Made	Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Mido's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Mido

Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) vs Quartz

The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer runs the Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) (Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic, 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Mido

40mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Stauer

Stauer sits in the lower tier

The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Multifort Powerwind Chronometer uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating with 80 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

100m (10 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Mido

Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

Choose the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer if you prioritize Silicon Balance Spring COSC Automatic engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic Caliber 80 Si (COSC) with 80 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Mido bringing Swiss Made tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. On price, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer at 40mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Multifort Powerwind Chronometer uses Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

More Comparisons

Mido Multifort vs Tissot Gentleman

Two 40mm Swiss automatics, one of them certified

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer

Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $1,000–$1,500

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Explore These Watches

Mido Multifort Powerwind Chronometer — Full Review Stauer 1920s Retrograde — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.