Mido Ocean Star GMT vs Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Two divers compared — $1,000–$1,500 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 ($500–$1,000) delivers Seiko In-House Automatic technology in the tier below the Mido Ocean Star GMT ($1,000–$1,500). The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 measures 41.7mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Ocean Star GMT justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661). Both represent excellent choices in the diver category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Mido Ocean Star GMT | Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 41.7mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) | Automatic Caliber 4R35 |
| Caliber Type | Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | 41 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire with Double-sided AR | Hardlex Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Mido's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Mido Ocean Star GMT features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Sapphire with Double-sided AR protection. The Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 offers Stainless Steel construction at 41.7mm with Hardlex Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) vs Automatic Caliber 4R35
The Ocean Star GMT runs the Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) (Automatic (ETA C07.661 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 uses the Automatic Caliber 4R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 41 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Ocean Star GMT edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 41.7mm — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Ocean Star GMT has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Prospex Samurai SRPL13 at 41.7mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Seiko sits in the lower tier
The Mido Ocean Star GMT sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Ocean Star GMT uses Sapphire with Double-sided AR with 80 Hours, against Hardlex Crystal and 41 Hours on the Prospex Samurai SRPL13. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Ocean Star GMT is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Prospex Samurai SRPL13 handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Mido
Ocean Star GMT
Choose the Mido Ocean Star GMT if you prioritize Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Choose the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 41.7mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Caliber 4R35 with 41 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Mido Ocean Star GMT and Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Mido bringing Swiss Made tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.