OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
OLEVS's dress watch meets Seiko's diver
Quick Verdict
The OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch ($100–$150) offers Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Moon Phase Dress Watch measures mid-size and is rated for daily wear. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch | Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $100–$150 | $1,000–$1,500 |
| Case Size | — | 40.5mm |
| Movement | Quartz | Automatic 6R35 |
| Caliber Type | Quartz (Battery) | Seiko In-House Automatic |
| Power Reserve | — | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | — | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | — | Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating |
| Origin | OLEVS | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
OLEVS's design language vs Seiko's approach
The OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch features a Stainless Steel case at mid-size with crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating construction at 40.5mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz vs Automatic 6R35
The Moon Phase Dress Watch runs the Quartz (Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
Mid-size vs 40.5mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Moon Phase Dress Watch wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm. Water resistance differs: 50m vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
OLEVS sits in the lower tier
The OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch sits at $100–$150 and the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at $1,000–$1,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Moon Phase Dress Watch uses a hardened crystal with a standard reserve, against Sapphire and 70 Hours on the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Moon Phase Dress Watch is rated to 50m while the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation handles 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
OLEVS
Moon Phase Dress Watch
Choose the OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch if you prioritize Quartz (Battery) engineering, OLEVS craftsmanship, and reliable water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Quartz with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you value Seiko In-House Automatic technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40.5mm proportions. At $1,000–$1,500, the Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch and Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the OLEVS bringing OLEVS tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)
Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs OLEVS Moon Phase Dress Watch
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets OLEVS's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

