Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box)

Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $10,000–$25,000

Quick Verdict

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000) offers In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) precision in the tier below the Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) ($10,000–$25,000). The PRX Powermatic 80 measures 40mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) per Rolex for the period water resistance. Both are exceptional timepieces for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80

Tissot

PRX Powermatic 80

$500–$1,000

Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box)

Rolex

Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box)

$10,000–$25,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureTissot PRX Powermatic 80Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box)
Price$500–$1,000$10,000–$25,000
Case Size40mm36mm
MovementAutomatic Powermatic 80.111Automatic, Rolex calibre 1570 (non-quickset date)
Caliber TypeIn-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base)Rolex 1570, chronometer certified
Power Reserve80 HoursAbout 48 hours
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)50m (5 ATM) per Rolex for the period
CrystalScratch-resistant SapphireAcrylic, Cyclops
Case Material316L Stainless SteelStainless steel, smooth domed bezel
OriginSwiss MadeSwiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Tissot's design language vs Rolex's approach

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Scratch-resistant Sapphire protection. The Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) offers Stainless steel, smooth domed bezel construction at 36mm with Acrylic, Cyclops. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Tissot

Automatic Powermatic 80.111 vs Automatic, Rolex calibre 1570 (non-quickset date)

The PRX Powermatic 80 runs the Automatic Powermatic 80.111 (In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) uses the Automatic, Rolex calibre 1570 (non-quickset date) (Rolex 1570, chronometer certified, About 48 hours reserve) at standard. The PRX Powermatic 80 edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Rolex

40mm vs 36mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the PRX Powermatic 80 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) at 36mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM) per Rolex for the period.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Tissot

Tissot sits in the lower tier

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) at $10,000–$25,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire with 80 Hours, against Acrylic, Cyclops and About 48 hours on the Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box). Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Tissot

100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM) per Rolex for the period

The PRX Powermatic 80 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) handles 50m (5 ATM) per Rolex for the period. The PRX Powermatic 80 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Tissot

PRX Powermatic 80

Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you prioritize In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Rolex

Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box)

Choose the Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) if you value Rolex 1570, chronometer certified technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 36mm proportions. At $10,000–$25,000, the Automatic, Rolex calibre 1570 (non-quickset date) with About 48 hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 and Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Tissot bringing Swiss Made tradition while Rolex delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits a band lower ($500–$1,000 against $10,000–$25,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $500–$1,000. However, the Rolex Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The PRX Powermatic 80 at 40mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) at 36mm with 50m (5 ATM) per Rolex for the period is similarly capable. The PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire while the Datejust 1600 (steel, smooth bezel, blue Buckley dial, about 1971, box) uses Acrylic, Cyclops. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than acrylic.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.