Updated
Rado True Square Automatic vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Rado's timepiece meets Stauer's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The True Square Automatic justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic ETA C07.611. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Rado True Square Automatic | Stauer 1920s Retrograde |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,500–$2,500 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 38mm (Square) | 43mm |
| Movement | Automatic ETA C07.611 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) | Quartz |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer |
| Crystal | Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) | Mineral crystal |
| Case Material | Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic | Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Stauer (USA brand, imported) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Rado's design language vs Stauer's approach
The Rado True Square Automatic features a Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic case at 38mm (Square) with Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic ETA C07.611 vs Quartz
The True Square Automatic runs the Automatic ETA C07.611 (Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The True Square Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
38mm (Square) vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 38mm (Square), the True Square Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Stauer sits in the lower tier
The Rado True Square Automatic sits at $1,500–$2,500 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the True Square Automatic uses Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) with 80 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
The True Square Automatic is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The 1920s Retrograde offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Rado
True Square Automatic
Choose the Rado True Square Automatic if you prioritize Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,500–$2,500, it delivers Automatic ETA C07.611 with 80 Hours power reserve.
View the dossierStauer
1920s Retrograde
Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Rado True Square Automatic and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Rado bringing Swiss Made tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Rado True Square Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Rado's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Rado True Square Automatic
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $1,500–$2,500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

