Rado True Square Automatic vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Rado's timepiece meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Rado True Square Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The True Square Automatic justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic ETA C07.611. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Rado True Square Automatic | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,500–$2,500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 38mm (Square) | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic ETA C07.611 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Rado's design language vs Timex's approach
The Rado True Square Automatic features a Monobloc High-Tech Ceramic case at 38mm (Square) with Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic ETA C07.611 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The True Square Automatic runs the Automatic ETA C07.611 (Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The True Square Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
38mm (Square) vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 38mm (Square), the True Square Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Rado True Square Automatic sits at $1,500–$2,500 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the True Square Automatic uses Sapphire (Anti-Reflective) with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The True Square Automatic is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Rado
True Square Automatic
Choose the Rado True Square Automatic if you prioritize Powermatic 80 (ETA-Based) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,500–$2,500, it delivers Automatic ETA C07.611 with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Rado True Square Automatic and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Rado bringing Swiss Made tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Rado True Square Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Rado's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Rado True Square Automatic
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $1,500–$2,500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.