Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Seiko's diver meets Stauer's dress watch

Quick Verdict

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150) delivers Quartz technology in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The 1920s Retrograde measures 43mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation justifies its premium with Made in Japan heritage and Automatic 6R35. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

SeikoProspex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation$1,000–$1,500 Check price Stauer1920s Retrograde$100–$150 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Seiko

Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

$1,000–$1,500

Check Price Full Review

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation	Stauer 1920s Retrograde
Price	$1,000–$1,500	$100–$150
Case Size	40.5mm	43mm
Movement	Automatic 6R35	Quartz
Caliber Type	Seiko In-House Automatic	Quartz
Power Reserve	70 Hours	Battery
Water Resistance	200m (20 ATM)	100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer
Crystal	Sapphire	Mineral crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating	Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)
Origin	Made in Japan	Stauer (USA brand, imported)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Seiko's design language vs Stauer's approach

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation features a Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating case at 40.5mm with Sapphire protection. The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) construction at 43mm with Mineral crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Seiko

Automatic 6R35 vs Quartz

The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation runs the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The 1920s Retrograde uses the Quartz (Quartz, Battery reserve) at standard. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Seiko

40.5mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence

At 40.5mm, the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the 1920s Retrograde at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer.

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Stauer

Stauer sits in the lower tier

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Stauer 1920s Retrograde at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses Sapphire with 70 Hours, against Mineral crystal and Battery on the 1920s Retrograde. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Seiko

200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer

The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the 1920s Retrograde handles 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Seiko

Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you prioritize Seiko In-House Automatic engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you value Quartz technology, Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation and Stauer 1920s Retrograde represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Seiko bringing Made in Japan tradition while Stauer delivers Stauer (USA brand, imported) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is rated 200 m against 100 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits a band lower ($100–$150 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer is similarly capable. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses Sapphire while the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

More Comparisons

Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)

Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Explore These Watches

Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation — Full Review Stauer 1920s Retrograde — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.