Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1
Two timepieces compared — $250–$500 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) offers Self-Winding Automatic precision in the tier below the Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 ($500–$1,000). The Classic Automatic 98A139 measures 45mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 counters with Casio (Japan) craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional timepieces for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 | Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm |
| Movement | Automatic, 21 Jewels | Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled |
| Caliber Type | Self-Winding Automatic | Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth |
| Power Reserve | — | Tough Solar (Rechargeable) |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Crystal | Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating |
| Case Material | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel | Bio-Based Resin / Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 offers Bio-Based Resin / Stainless Steel construction at 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled
The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 uses the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 at 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating and Tough Solar (Rechargeable) on the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 handles 100m (10 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Classic Automatic 98A139
Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1
Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 if you value Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 + Bluetooth technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 50.8 × 45.8 × 14.9mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1 represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRW-B1000-1
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $250–$500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.