Head-to-Head Comparison

Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm

Two timepieces compared — $250–$500 vs $250–$500

Quick Verdict

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) and Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic engineering while the Marlin Automatic 40mm focuses on Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139

Bulova

Classic Automatic 98A139

$250–$500

Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm

Timex

Marlin Automatic 40mm

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureBulova Classic Automatic 98A139Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm
Price$250–$500$250–$500
Case Size45mm40mm
MovementAutomatic, 21 JewelsAutomatic Miyota 8205
Caliber TypeSelf-Winding AutomaticMiyota Automatic
Power Reserve40 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)30m (3 ATM)
CrystalDomed CrystalMineral Crystal
Case MaterialBlack Ion-Plated Stainless SteelStainless Steel
OriginJapanese MovementMade in Japan (Movement)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Timex's approach

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Mineral Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Timex

Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Automatic Miyota 8205

The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Marlin Automatic 40mm uses the Automatic Miyota 8205 (Miyota Automatic, 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Marlin Automatic 40mm offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Marlin Automatic 40mm at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Mineral Crystal and 40 Hours on the Marlin Automatic 40mm. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)

The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Marlin Automatic 40mm handles 30m (3 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Classic Automatic 98A139

Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Marlin Automatic 40mm

Choose the Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm if you value Miyota Automatic technology, Made in Japan (Movement) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Miyota 8205 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm represent two distinct approaches to the timepiece category — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Timex delivers Made in Japan (Movement) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) offers Automatic, 21 Jewels with reliable power reserve, while the Timex Marlin Automatic 40mm ($250–$500) features Automatic Miyota 8205 with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Japanese Movement craftsmanship vs Made in Japan (Movement) engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic technology while the Marlin Automatic 40mm prioritizes Miyota Automatic precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Classic Automatic 98A139 at 45mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Marlin Automatic 40mm at 40mm with 30m (3 ATM) is similarly capable. The Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal while the Marlin Automatic 40mm uses Mineral Crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.