Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Casio Duro MDV106
Two divers compared — $500–$1,000 vs $50–$100
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the diver category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Casio Duro MDV106 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 44mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Quartz Module 2784 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | 3-Year Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) Diver |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio Duro MDV106 offers Stainless Steel construction at 44mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz Module 2784
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Duro MDV106 uses the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery reserve) at standard. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 44mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Duro MDV106 at 44mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM) Diver.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio Duro MDV106 at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and 3-Year Battery on the Duro MDV106. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM) Diver
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Duro MDV106 handles 200m (20 ATM) Diver. Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 44mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Casio Duro MDV106 represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.