Casio Duro vs Citizen Skyhawk
Same 200m rating, twelve times the price
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) and the Citizen Skyhawk A-T ($500–$1,000) are both Japanese, both rated to 200m, and both about the same size on the wrist. The Duro is the better dive watch. The Skyhawk is the better instrument: it powers itself from light and corrects itself against an atomic radio signal, so it never needs a battery and never needs setting.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Duro MDV106 | Citizen Promaster Skyhawk A-T |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 45mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 2784 | Eco-Drive (Radio-Controlled, Atomic Timekeeping) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Citizen Eco-Drive U680 (Solar + Radio-Controlled) |
| Power Reserve | 3-Year Battery | — |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) Diver | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel (Black Ion-Plated) |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
One is a clean dive watch, the other is a loaded cockpit
The Duro is a straightforward diver: high-contrast dial, date window, unidirectional bezel, and very little else competing for attention. The Skyhawk is the opposite argument — black ion-plated steel, two LCD windows, several subdials and a slide-rule bezel, all on the same face. The Duro is easier to read at a glance; the Skyhawk rewards a second look. Neither is trying to be the other.
Movement & Performance
Ordinary quartz against a solar movement that sets itself
The Duro runs Casio quartz module 2784 on a battery rated around three years. It keeps ordinary quartz time, which means it drifts slowly and you reset it occasionally. The Skyhawk runs Citizen Eco-Drive calibre U680: light charges it, so there is no battery to replace, and it listens for a low-frequency radio broadcast carrying the time from an atomic reference and corrects itself. That is the substantive gap between these two watches — not accuracy on paper, but whether the watch needs you at all.
Wearability & Fit
Almost the same size, very different presence
They are within a millimetre of each other — the Duro at 44mm, the Skyhawk at 45mm — so neither is the small option, and both need a reasonable wrist. The difference is density rather than diameter: the Skyhawk carries a thick slide-rule bezel and a crowded dial, so it reads as the larger, busier watch even though the case is barely bigger. If your other watch is 38mm, both of these will feel like a different category of object.
Value & Cost of Ownership
The Duro wins on value; the Skyhawk wins on upkeep
On purchase price this is not close: the Duro sits in the $50–$100 band and the Skyhawk in the $500–$1,000 band, for the same 200m rating. Running costs invert the story. The Duro needs a battery roughly every three years, and its mineral crystal will pick up scratches that sapphire would have shrugged off. The Skyhawk needs neither a battery nor setting, and its sapphire crystal is far harder to mark. Buy the Duro if the sticker price is the constraint; buy the Skyhawk if never thinking about the watch again is worth the premium.
Brand Heritage
Two different things Japan is good at
Both are Japanese and both are the strongest expression of what their maker does. Casio built the Duro on the idea that genuine dive-watch hardware should not be expensive, and it has become the default recommendation for a first serious watch for exactly that reason. Citizen built the Skyhawk on Eco-Drive and radio synchronisation, technologies aimed at removing maintenance from watch ownership entirely. Neither is a compromise version of the other.
Our Verdict
Casio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro if you want a real dive watch and nothing else. It has the unidirectional bezel, the screw-down crown and caseback, and the 200m rating, for the price of a dinner out. The compromises are honest ones: mineral glass instead of sapphire, and a battery every three years or so.
Check Price on AmazonCitizen
Promaster Skyhawk A-T
Choose the Citizen Skyhawk if the appeal is the instrument rather than the diving. Light powers it and a radio signal sets it, so there is no battery to change and no time to correct. You are also buying sapphire, world time, a chronograph, an alarm and a perpetual calendar — and accepting a busy 45mm dial in return.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Duro MDV106 and the Citizen Promaster Skyhawk A-T are both rated to 200m water resistance, but the Duro is the one with true dive-watch hardware — a unidirectional bezel and a screw-down crown — while the Skyhawk spends its price premium on an Eco-Drive movement that runs on light and a radio receiver that sets the watch from an atomic clock.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

