Head-to-Head Comparison

Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Two divers compared — $500–$1,000 vs $100–$150

Quick Verdict

The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak ($100–$150) delivers Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) technology in the tier below the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000). The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak measures 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the diver category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350

Bulova

Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350

$500–$1,000

Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Casio

G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

$100–$150

Specifications Compared

FeatureBulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak
Price$500–$1,000$100–$150
Case Size41mm45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick)
MovementAutomatic Miyota 8215Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth)
Caliber TypeMiyota AutomaticCasio Quartz (Solar-Powered)
Power Reserve42 HoursAbout 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio)
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelCarbon Core Guard Resin
OriginMade in Japan (Movement)Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak offers Carbon Core Guard Resin construction at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Bulova

Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth)

The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak uses the Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) (Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered), About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) reserve) at standard. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Bulova

41mm vs 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) — different wrist presence

At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick). Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) on the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350

Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak

Choose the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak if you value Casio Quartz (Solar-Powered) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) with About 7 months on a full charge without light; about 18 months in power-saving (Casio) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) offers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve, while the Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak ($100–$150) features Quartz Module 5689 (Tough Solar + Bluetooth) with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.
The Casio G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $100–$150. However, the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 at 41mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak at 45.4mm (48.5mm lug-to-lug, 11.9mm thick) with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal while the G-Shock GA-B2100 CasiOak uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.