Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Longines HydroConquest Automatic
Two divers compared — $500–$1,000 vs $1,500–$2,500
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000) offers Miyota Automatic precision in the tier below the Longines HydroConquest Automatic ($1,500–$2,500). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 measures 41mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The HydroConquest Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Longines HydroConquest Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $1,500–$2,500 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 41mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Automatic L888.5 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | 72 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Longines's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Longines HydroConquest Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 41mm with Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Automatic L888.5
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The HydroConquest Automatic uses the Automatic L888.5 (ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring, 72 Hours reserve) at 25,200 vph (3.5 Hz). The HydroConquest Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 41mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is similarly sized compared to the HydroConquest Automatic at 41mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Bulova sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Longines HydroConquest Automatic at $1,500–$2,500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating and 72 Hours on the HydroConquest Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the HydroConquest Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The HydroConquest Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonLongines
HydroConquest Automatic
Choose the Longines HydroConquest Automatic if you value ETA-Based Automatic with Silicon Balance Spring technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 41mm proportions. At $1,500–$2,500, the Automatic L888.5 with 72 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Longines HydroConquest Automatic represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Longines delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tudor Black Bay 58 vs Longines HydroConquest
Is the price jump to Tudor justified?
Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical vs Longines HydroConquest
A hand-wound field watch against a 300m Swiss diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.