Bulova Surveyor Automatic vs Casio Duro MDV106
Bulova's dress watch meets Casio's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Surveyor Automatic ($250–$500). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Surveyor Automatic justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Surveyor Automatic | Casio Duro MDV106 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 39mm | 44mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Quartz Module 2784 |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | 3-Year Battery |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) Diver |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 39mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio Duro MDV106 offers Stainless Steel construction at 44mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz Module 2784
The Surveyor Automatic runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Duro MDV106 uses the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery reserve) at standard. The Surveyor Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
39mm vs 44mm — different wrist presence
At 39mm, the Surveyor Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Duro MDV106 at 44mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM) Diver.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic sits at $250–$500 and the Casio Duro MDV106 at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Surveyor Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and 3-Year Battery on the Duro MDV106. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM) Diver
The Surveyor Automatic is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Duro MDV106 handles 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Duro MDV106 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Surveyor Automatic
Choose the Bulova Surveyor Automatic if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 44mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Surveyor Automatic and Casio Duro MDV106 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.