Head-to-Head Comparison

Bulova Surveyor Automatic vs Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Bulova's dress watch meets Casio's diver

Quick Verdict

The Bulova Surveyor Automatic ($250–$500) and Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Surveyor Automatic emphasizes Miyota Automatic engineering while the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 focuses on Casio (Japan) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova Surveyor Automatic

Bulova

Surveyor Automatic

$250–$500

Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Casio

Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureBulova Surveyor AutomaticCasio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7
Price$250–$500$250–$500
Case Size39mm56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm
MovementAutomatic Miyota 8215Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled
Caliber TypeMiyota AutomaticTough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6
Power Reserve42 HoursTough Solar (Rechargeable)
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelResin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet
OriginMade in Japan (Movement)Casio (Japan)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Casio's approach

The Bulova Surveyor Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 39mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 offers Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet construction at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Bulova

Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled

The Surveyor Automatic runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) reserve) at standard. The Surveyor Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Bulova

39mm vs 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm — different wrist presence

At 39mm, the Surveyor Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Bulova Surveyor Automatic sits at $250–$500 and the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Surveyor Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Tough Solar (Rechargeable) on the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Surveyor Automatic is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 handles 200m (20 ATM). The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Surveyor Automatic

Choose the Bulova Surveyor Automatic if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Casio

Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 if you value Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Surveyor Automatic and Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Bulova Surveyor Automatic ($250–$500) offers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve, while the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 ($250–$500) features Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship vs Casio (Japan) engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Surveyor Automatic emphasizes Miyota Automatic technology while the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 prioritizes Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Surveyor Automatic at 39mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Surveyor Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal while the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.