Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Duro MDV106
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) delivers Casio Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 ($500–$1,000). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The PRX Powermatic 80 justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Powermatic 80.111. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 | Casio Duro MDV106 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 44mm |
| Movement | Automatic Powermatic 80.111 | Quartz Module 2784 |
| Caliber Type | In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) | Casio Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 80 Hours | 3-Year Battery |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) Diver |
| Crystal | Scratch-resistant Sapphire | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | 316L Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Casio (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Tissot's design language vs Casio's approach
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 features a 316L Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Scratch-resistant Sapphire protection. The Casio Duro MDV106 offers Stainless Steel construction at 44mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Powermatic 80.111 vs Quartz Module 2784
The PRX Powermatic 80 runs the Automatic Powermatic 80.111 (In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Duro MDV106 uses the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery reserve) at standard. The PRX Powermatic 80 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 44mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the PRX Powermatic 80 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Duro MDV106 at 44mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM) Diver.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Casio Duro MDV106 at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the PRX Powermatic 80 uses Scratch-resistant Sapphire with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and 3-Year Battery on the Duro MDV106. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM) Diver
The PRX Powermatic 80 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Duro MDV106 handles 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Duro MDV106 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Tissot
PRX Powermatic 80
Choose the Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you prioritize In-House Automatic (ETA C07.111 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Powermatic 80.111 with 80 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCasio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you value Casio Quartz (Battery) technology, Casio (Japan) heritage, and 44mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 and Casio Duro MDV106 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Tissot bringing Swiss Made tradition while Casio delivers Casio (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.